Impacts of Population Growth on Malaysias Culture

Impacts of Population Growth on Malaysias Culture I have chosen to write an essay on Malaysias population growth, how it has changed and how it affects the culture of my country. In my essay, I had included the background and the history of my country and also the reason why it had change and how its change for the past few years. I also include my critical and original thinking regarding this topic. Malaysia Background and History As a Malaysian, I can safely say that Malaysia have a very interesting background and history. Malaysia is known for it rich cultural history. The rainforest and the wildlife in Malaysia are preserved from century. Now days, Malaysia also known for it cuisine, world famous beaches and also Malaysia is famous among the tourist because of the different shopping mall that Malaysia have and the price of shopping in Malaysia is quite cheap. Malaysia had been a tourist spot for so many years already and to cater to this tourist needs, Malaysia has plenty of Resort that are offering a perfect gateway for tourist that would like to escape from the city life. But its not just for the tourist, sometimes the local also like to get away from the busyness of the city and routine life and just relax. Malaysia is known also as the only country that has mixture of three different races such as Malay, Indian and Chinese. In Malaysia, there are three different religions this is because in Malaysia the y got three different races so the religion is also different. Mostly Malay peoples, they are Muslims, Indians are Hindus while Chinese are mostly Buddhist. So as you can see, it a multicultural country and its a colourful country to live in because everyone regardless which race are you, they intent to celebrate each other celebration. Now I would like to briefly explain Malaysia history, Malaysia gains their independent in 31st August 1957. Afterward, subsequent states join Malaysia in 1963 and formed the country of Malaysia (Malaysia Background, 2002). Malaysian national language is Malay. Its safe to say that Malaysia is a wonderful place not just to live but also to visit because Malaysia can offer you so many things. Culture in Malaysia As mention earlier, Malaysia is known for its culture and culture does play a strong foundation in everyday life of Malaysian. Malaysia is vibrant and diverse in they own ways. Malaysian people intent to share each others cultural richness and its had been Malaysia main political stability and growth. Malaysian peoples are warm accommodating and a very easy-going people. Malay culture had always been linked by the love of the land and a strongly believe in Islam (Culture and Peoples, 2010). Family ties, tolerance, goodwill and good manners are among the social norm of Malaysian people. In Malaysia, education level of Malaysian had a change toward the better in where new schools and subsidies for the lower income population are provided by the government and also a new infrastructure are provided in order to achieve the high level of education (Culture and Peoples, 2010). Also, theres a different festival and celebration in Malaysia that we celebrate every year such as Hari Raya Aidil fitri for the Muslim, Deewali for Hindu and Chinese New Year for the Buddhist. National Day or Merdeka celebration are celebrate every year and normally all Malaysian will come together and celebrate them together with a colourful traditional performance, foods, firework and performance from the famous Malaysian artist. Population Growth in Malaysia (Malaysia Population, 2009) As you can see on the graph above, Malaysian population had growth however the population in Malaysia grow slowly. There are not many different in each year. For example, in 1999 the population for Malaysia was 22.712 million while in 2002 the population for Malaysia was 24.527 million and in 2009 the population for Malaysia is 27.761 million. As you can see, there are not much different between these years. However throughout the year Malaysia population growth had grown. The reason of the population change (How and Why) In the 60s changes in population pattern and economy had significantly affected Malaysian families. Some of the reason is that the rural-urban, economic development and migration play one of the strongest reasons. Now days most of Malaysian family consist of father, mother and two or one children. Extended family consist at least one elderly parent with an adult child (Malaysia, Marriage and Family information pattens, 2010). Other reason why it change or grown slowly is probably because in the 60s peoples intent to get marry in the younger age and have a lot of children but in the modern world, people intent to marry in later age and normally have only one or two children in their family. Population Growth effects on the culture Population growth does somehow effects the culture in Malaysia. But the effects hit the city people more than the villager. In the village the culture and the tradition is still protected while in the city, the culture is more modernized than in the village. In the village, traditional custom are still hugely practice and intent to be more protective about it. While in the city, its more toward the western culture where the younger peoples most likely to spend their night in the club, drinking and shopping rather that spending their time with the family. The way they dress also changing, its more toward the western. You can rarely see anyone in the city wearing Malaysian traditional dress but in the village you can still see them in Malaysian traditional dress. Other reason why it could effects Malaysian culture is because theres a lot of foreigner now days leaving in Malaysia, so people in the city intent to follow the foreigner culture rather than sticking with Malaysian culture. B ut the benefit of this is that most of Malaysian can speak well English. Also it makes Malaysia and attractive country to visit and live in and also make people know that Malaysia is a multicultural country. Conclusion To conclude my research on how the population growth in my country which is Malaysia had effects the culture, I must say that even though theres a negative side of the growth however theres also plenty of benefits. Such as, now that Malaysia is well known all around the world, its actually creating more opportunity for us as Malaysian to grow or to develop not only our country but also our self. Even though the effects hit more towards the city people, it does not mean that all of them already forgotten about their culture. Even so most of them act or follow western culture more than our own culture, they still care about the value of family and still respect the country that they live in. Here we can see the clear difference how Malaysia was few years ago and how Malaysia is today. References Alloexpat (2010). Culture and Peoples, 26 February 2010 from:  http://www.malaysia.alloexpat.com/malaysia_information/culture_malaysia.php Index Mundi (2009). Malaysia population. Retrieved 03 March 2010 from:  http://www.indexmundi.com/malaysia/population.html Malaysia.com (2009). About Malaysia. Retrieved 26 February 2010 from:  http://www.malaysia.com/about-malaysia.html  Ã‚   Malaysia information (2002). Malaysia background . Retrieved 26 February 2010 from:  http://www.asia-planet.net/malaysia/information.htm   Malaysia information (2002). Wealth of Culture. Retrieved 26 February 2010 from:  http://www.asia-planet.net/malaysia/wealth-culture.htm  

Philosophy Communication Barriers Essay

(a) How does James think of my intending to say something? Does he think of it as a process in consciousness? James argues that our phrasing â€Å"intended to say† is an almost wrong explanation on a subconscious or even psychic thing that it happening within our minds.   The point is that we never consciously form the words in our minds or even draw upon our memory banks to call to mind images of the thing that we mean to say. Instead, it is an unconscious function of the mind that we hear something and choose to respond to it with some form of language. In the event that the language we choose is wrong, we often react with the phrase. â€Å"What I meant to say was†¦Ã¢â‚¬  James argues that this happens when the precognition of our own mind fails to work rapidly enough to anticipate the reaction of the person we are speaking to and choose the proper words to convey to a thought stream to that specific person. On the most basic level, it means that our minds did not act quickly enough to substitute the proper word into a sentence. For example, imagine talking to your best friend about her sister. The intended sentence would be, â€Å"How’s she doing?† As the speaker you would not have planned out the conversation or thought specifically about what to ask, but when you speak and say, â€Å"How’s he doing?† the immediate response is to say, ‘I meant she. How’s she doing?’ there is never a point at which the conscious mind stops and chooses the words to use. This might therefore make an interesting discussion for linguists and psychologists to determine how speech actually happens. James argues that it is a subconscious thing, which implies then that speech is a learned ability you can train the subconscious mind. Take for example learning to speak another language fluently.   Teachers argue that you cannot speak another language fluently until you can think in that language. The premise is basically the same as what James has argues. If you are completely fluent in the language and someone asks,   â€Å"Que es el nombre del gato?† You will be responding with the cat’s name before the image of the cat is even called to mind. If you are less than fluent, you will need to translate the question before you can answer, thus moving the response from the subconscious speech centers to the conscious mind. [(b) Can the arguments Wittgenstein employs against the idea that understanding words is a conscious process be adapted to show that intending or meaning to say words is not a conscious process that begins before I say them   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Wittgenstein argues that the meaning of a word is defined as we use it, not by some memory flash card system begun when we are children.   This then would explain in English the tendency to crease euphemisms and phrases which cannot be translated literally based on the presumed meaning of the individual world. To use his argument, if language were a conscious thing, human speech patterns would always be precise and would never relay on simile, metaphor or any other form of literary device. Instead, in essence, he is arguing that because language to create imagery that is not a specific reflection of the exact meaning of what is said, it is a subconscious action. Likewise then, if the use of language is subconscious and not dependent on a specific meaning when a word is chosen, Wittgenstein’s argument can easily be developed to explain that the use of words or even the development of an answer is not necessarily a conscious thing. Think of it as a sort of language autopilot. Our subconscious mind understands what is being discussed and how to respond to it before the conscious mind has a chance to understand the nature of the question. Therefore, the subconscious mind can formulate a response and begin it before the conscious mind starts to speak. In the event that the conscious mind disrupts the process and inserts its own words, the subconscious mind can send it a message that says, ‘What I meant to say was†¦.† c) James claims that intending to say something is or provides an anticipation or premonition (=knowledge in advance) of the words I will say or think. Do Wittgenstein’s remarks in section. 187-192 show that James is laboring under some misunderstanding about this? Explain. Wittgenstein’s remarks indicate that James is misunderstanding the functioning of the mind by calling the natural process of communication between the conscious and subconscious premonition. He would argue that the act of speech is a sort of subconscious act, with only specific forms of speech coming from the conscious mind. If both parts of the mind are working in proper harmony, the subconscious can formulate and plan a response long before the conscious mind can even think about it. However, this is not a self-premonition or anything as supernatural as James might be implying. Instead, it is a factor of the understanding of the human brain and how it works. Since the body cannot, by definition, understand the workings of the subconscious, we simply must accept that these incidences occur when the subconscious works more rapidly than the conscious mind.   Wittgenstein argues that this is not a premonition, but simply evidence that the mind works much faster than we appreciate. 2.) P. F. Strawson writes: States or experiences†¦owe their identity as particulars to the identity of the person whose states and experiences they are. From this it follows immediately that if they can be identified as particular states and experiences at all, they must be possessed†¦in such a way that it is logically impossible that a particular state or experience in fact possessed by someone should have been possessed by anyone else. The requirements of identity rule out logical transferability of ownership. [Individuals, p. 97] (a) Briefly describe Wittgenstein’s treatment of the idea that â€Å"another person can’t have my pains† in Philosophical Investigations Section 253. (Describe the aims and strategy of his remarks.)[ Wittgenstein disagrees with Strawson, with a tongue-in-cheek sarcasm to illustrate that in the event of Siamese twins, two people could share the exact same pain. Ultimately, though his goal is to demonstrate that identity is not as important to the identification of pain as far as location and intensity. Whether a person has the exact same headache that you are having is not nearly as relevant as the fact that they have had a headache in the past and can therefore commiserate with the pain that you are feeling.   In essence, he is arguing that the sameness of the pain is also irrelevant. When discussing the human condition, it is more important to draw parallels between like circumstances than to throw up semi-rational boundaries such as the identifiers that Strawson used. While it may technically, maybe, be impossible for more than one other person to feel the exact same pain that you are feeling, in the human nature of inexact speech we often use the phrase â€Å"same pain† to indicate that we have been in similar circumstances. Drawing unnecessary barriers by pointing out that our individuality will affect the way that we feel pain does nothing to promote a greater understanding of pain, the nature of the individual, the nature of empathy or the human condition. If Strawson were attempting to define the uniqueness of the individual, his commentary might have been relevant, but in a discussion about the nature of pain, it is divisive and irrelevant. The point is to discuss the sameness of the human condition in that while we may have different understandings of pain, we can interrelate via the concept of pain. For example, two women with menstrual cramps may not be experiencing the same intensity of pain or even the same location, but they can relate based on the similar circumstance. (b) Do observations like those in his PhilosophicalRemarks *2 account for all the ways we use the expression (same) pain?] Wittgenstein’s examples via Philosophical Remarks perhaps do not go far enough in disavowing Strawson’s claims, but he does make a good start. By arguing that the criteria of identifying the sameness of pain involves location and intensity as criteria rather than identity of the person feeling the pain, Wittgenstein effectively argues that Strawson’s claim is false. What he fails to discuss are the non-physical sources of pain and whether they can be the same pain or if Strawson is closer to the mark when using inaccurate language to describe emotional trauma. But here too, if Wittgenstein had desired, he could argue that Strawson’s claim is fundamentally flawed. Again, we go first to the example of identical twins that are raised together. Though there might be some differences in their emotional makeup, for the most part, they are going to feel emotional pain in the same way. But even if we forgo the genetic aspect ad simply discuss emotion as an end result of experience, it seems ludicrous to assume that each of the six billion people on the planet will have experienced life in a completely unique way and will therefore never have the same pain as another person. (c) Push Wittgenstein’s investigation one step further. We say things like this: â€Å"I had two bad headaches today: one in the morning and one in the afternoon†. What are â€Å"criteria† for sameness and difference in such cases? The primary criteria for sameness and difference in this case would be the location of the headache and its intensity. For example, a tension headache might begin at the base of the spine and radiate upward, a sinus headache might begin just below the eyes and a migraine might be a throbbing in the temples. Each can be described as a bad headache depending on the severity and each is unique in its location. However, often people who are prone to headaches will have them in the same location and are given to saying, â€Å"I had that same headache again† to indicate to the listeners that this is a recurring problem in the same location with the same intensity. When language is used precisely, this is an inexact statement, but if the primary purpose of language is to convey meaning to the listener, this can be a much simpler way of saying â€Å"I have a headache again in the same spot as I did yesterday and it hurts the same amount.† Much like with the other discussion, Wittgenstein seems to be challenging his fellow philosophers regarding their choice and use of the language. Because the language itself is inexact, making a claim simply based on the language usage is invalid. (d) Do these cases vindicate Strawson? I do not believe these issues vindicate Strawson at all. It appears that he was doing exact what Wittgenstein was trying to warn against: he was using an imprecise example of language to erect a barrier to human empathy that need not exist. Generally speaking, when a person uses the phrases, â€Å"I feel your pain† it is to indicate that I have been in a similar circumstance and have felt pain because of it. As such, I can empathize with your pain. However, people simply do not talk that way and to expect them to do so is illogical. Therefore, Wittgenstein rebukes Strawson, fairly gently, trying to make him understand that the same is not always the same.   It makes perfect sense when you consider the propensity in English to use the phrase â€Å"exactly the same†. Though sameness implies that two things are alike, we have learned to differentiate between things that are similar and thus the same in casual conversation and things that are identical.

Sharing a Room Is Difficult

Sharing a room is difficult. Having a younger sister means mess, mess, and more mess. I try to arrange things a certain way and find them completely changed by the time I get home at the end of the day. Despite the downsides of sharing, I love my room because of the way it has changed throughout the years. The first thing you notice as you enter my bedroom is the blue stars on the white walls, and the cherry laminated wood flooring. The size of the room is not big neither small, just average sized. There is only one window which is on the far right corner, which lets the sunlight in every morning. We have a big mirror on the side facing the dresser and my bed. My bed is my favorite thing in my room. After a long day of studying or working out I get to relax on a soft, comfortable, full sized bed. It has a Dodger blue colored comforter set, and about a dozen pillows. There are usually two to three college books laying there for unfinished homework. Space for me is important. I like to have everything in place and very clean. My biggest obstacle is having enough room for my clothes in the closet. Everything is arranged into shirts, sweaters, and coats on one side; and jeans or sweats on the other. Workout shoes, tennis shoes, and heels are all nicely put on the bottom according to color. Movie nights are usually held at my house and in my room so I have a variety of comedies, action, and thriller movies. My all time favorites include: Gone in Sixty Seconds, Crash, A Walk to Remember, and Love and Basketball. I also have an Xbox in my room for when my brother wants to play Call of Duty. The television is my wakeup call every morning. I have a bookshelf filled with about thirty books. Some from high school other’s just for my enjoyment. I enjoy reading books other people recommend or books that grab my attention. Some of my favorite books you will definitely find on the top shelf are: Dear John, The Lovely Bones, and My Sister’s Keeper. I would usually get home and read for about half an hour on my warm and cozy bed.

Who Was the Best Progressive Era President - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 359 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Progressive Era Essay Did you like this example? During the Progressive Era, America had a lot of issues to address. Some issues included political corruption, monopolies, land loss, and poor working conditions. The second president during the Progressive Era, President William Howard Taft, seemed to be the most progressive by busting the most trusts and protecting consumers. First, Taft busted twice as many monopolies as the Great Trust-Buster Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt busted the trusts that he believed were bad, but Taft busted all of them. This trust-busting shows that Taft was the best because he busted all of them regardless of his own opinion. Secondly, Taft strengthened the Interstate Commerce Commission by allowing, Congress to pass the Mann-Elkins Act of 1910 which authorized the Interstate commerce Commission to set rates for railroads. The act also expanded the Interstate Commerce Commissions authority to cover telephones, telegraphs, and radios (millercenter.org). This act made Taft successful because it protected consumers, the working class, which was one of the main goals of the Progressive Era. Thirdly, Taft established the Postal Savings System which provided working class families a safe place to invest funds, encouraged deposits from people who were afraid of using private banks, increased the supply of currency, and made bank servi ces available to working people who did not have time to travel to far away banks (the Ultimate History Project). The Postal Savings System was also successful because it also protected consumers. Fourth, Taft passed the Sixteenth Amendment which reduced the federal governments authority to tax income without equally dividing it up among the states and the Seventeenth Amendment which allowed the direct election of senators. These amendments were just another important aspect because they decreased political corruption, which was another major goal of the Progressive Era. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Who Was the Best Progressive Era President" essay for you Create order Theodore Roosevelt deserves the grade of a B- because during his presidency he set the precedent for the future presidents. He was a very popular president, but he did not accomplish as many goals that Taft and Wilson did. Taft deserves an A because he achieved nearly all the Progressive Era goals. Lastly, Wilson deserves a B because he protected consumers and the environment, but he engaged in World War I in 1917.